Electronic Journal Of Gambling Issues

Issues

Special Issue Of Journal

The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues: eGambling (EJGI) offers an Internet-based forum for developments in gambling-related research, policy and treatment as well as personal accounts about gambling and gambling behaviour. Through publishing peer-reviewed articles about gambling as a social phenomenon and the prevention and treatment of gambling problems, it is our aim is to help make sense of how gambling affects us all.

Online Gambling Issues And Concerns

  1. Beaudoin, C. M., & Cox, B. J. (1999). Characteristics of problem gambling in a Canadian context:A preliminary study using a DSM-IV-based questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 483–487.Google Scholar
  2. Bergler, E. (1958). The Psychology of Gambling. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, R.I. (1987). Classical and operant paradigms in the management of gambling addictions. Behavioral Psychotherapy, 15, 111–122.Google Scholar
  4. Griffiths, M., & Delfabbro, P. (2001). The Biopsychosocial Approach to Gambling: Contextual Factors in Research and Clinical Interventions. eGambling: The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 5, feature. Retrieved April 26, 2002, from http://www.camh.net/egambling/ issue5/feature/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacobs, D.F. (1986). A general theory of addictions: A new theoretical model. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 15–31.Google Scholar
  6. Klingemann, H. K. H. (1995). Games, risk and prevention: The rehabilitation of “Homo Ludens.” Journal of Drug and Alcohol Education, 41,99–123.Google Scholar
  7. Ladouceur, R. Dube, D., & Bujold, A. (1994). Prevalence of pathological gambling and related problems among college students in the Quebec metropolitan area. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 289–293.Google Scholar
  8. Ladouceur, R. & Walker, M. (1998). The cognitive approach to understanding and treating pathological gambling. In A. S. Bellack and M. Hersen (Eds.). Comprehensive Clinical Psychology (pp. 588–601). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  9. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.Google Scholar
  10. Lesieur, H. R., Cross, J., Frank, M., Welch, M., White, C. M., Rubenstein, G, Moseley, K., & Mark, M. (1991). Gambling and pathological gambling among university students. Addictive Behaviors, 16, 517–527.Google Scholar
  11. McCormick, R. A. (1987). Pathological gambling: A parsimonious need state model. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 3, 257–263.Google Scholar
  12. Rosenthal, R. J. & Rugle, L. J. (1994). A psychodynamic approach to the treatment of pathological gambling: Part I. Achieving abstinence. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10,21–42.Google Scholar
  13. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1369–1376.Google Scholar
  14. Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Augmenting the theory of planned behavior: Roles for anticipated regret and descriptive norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2107–2142.Google Scholar